South America is astatine a crossroads. The onslaught connected Caracas, the abduction of Nicolas Maduro and the threats towards the Colombian and Mexican presidents by the US president are an ominous motion of the years ahead. In summation to equipped outer meddling, elections person sharpened governmental tensions from La Paz to Santiago, Buenos Aires to Quito, and the region’s biggest democracies are heading to the polls again aboriginal successful 2026. Unequal dividends from decades of growth, combined with the post-pandemic erosion of authorities capacity, person widened the entreaty of hard-line, populist responses. The information is not lone domestic: the region’s drift towards militarised politics, and the unfastened threats by the US, aboveground the risks of outer influence, a modern rehash of the banana republic and gunboat diplomacy playbook.
Taken together, these dynamics constituent to a unsafe convergence. Rising insecurity, hollowed-out governmental practice and renewed outer coercion are reinforcing 1 another, weakening institutions and making the portion erstwhile again susceptible to domination alternatively than self-determination.
Peru is simply a stark cautionary tale. For 2 decades, the state had above-average economical growth, attracted dense overseas investment, and adjacent sought OECD membership. By aboriginal 2026, the sol is wide regarded arsenic South America’s astir unchangeable currency. Yet prosperity has not translated into organization stability: 7 presidents successful 9 years talk to a deeper governmental dysfunction. The sociologist Julio Cotler has argued that Peru’s elites, enriched by exports of earthy materials, had scant incentives to stock gains oregon physique susceptible and inclusive institutions. The effect is simply a brittle governmental economy, wherever assemblage hierarchies linger, inequalities crossed gender, people and ethnicity persist, and authorities services are dysfunctional, weakening legitimacy and representation.
That brittleness is present colliding with insecurity. In Lima, transport strikes implicit rising unit and extortion person repeatedly paralysed the city; dozens of autobus drivers were murdered successful wide daylight passim 2025. Protests turned deadly successful October 2025, erstwhile a rapper and thoroughfare creator was changeable adjacent the authorities palace during demonstrations against the caller president, José Jerí. The president of Congress called the unfortunate a “terruco” (once a statement for terrorists), illustrating the toxicity of Peru’s governmental landscape, arsenic this word is simply a slur aimed astatine dissenters, often Indigenous oregon peasant, to delegitimise their protests and demands. This is not an isolated phenomenon, but a grounds of however governmental systems dainty societal struggle arsenic a policing problem, thing to beryllium repressed alternatively than addressed.
Peru’s effect has been the militarisation of nationalist space. Under Jerí, the authorities declared a authorities of exigency and sent soldiers to patrol the streets “until insecurity is eradicated”. Ecuador has tried thing similar, going truthful acold arsenic to state an “internal equipped conflict”, starring to expanding quality rights violations. When governmental demands are marginalised successful favour of subject oregon constabulary force, governmental practice collapses into patronage oregon fear. Peru’s Congress illustrates this illness of representation. It has go a plutocratic trading location wherever vested interests are waved through, alternatively than a forum for undertaking the reforms indispensable for the authorities to respond to the demands of its citizens.
The 2026 statesmanlike run successful Peru is amplifying this logic. Frontrunners committedness mega-prisons, drone surveillance, and adjacent transferring inmates to Salvadoran prisons. Keiko Fujimori, the girl of erstwhile president Alberto Fujimori, openly invokes “mano dura” (a militarised effect to the situation of the authorities and representation). Across the Andes, “order” is backmost arsenic a magical solution and governmental proposal, reinforced by US enactment for repression arsenic a argumentation response, though it seldom fixes the causes of violence: societal exclusion, impunity and hollowed-out states.
Chile offers a cautionary example. The celebratory chants for Pinochet heard aft Jose Antonio Kast’s electoral triumph exemplify a nostalgia for the certainty of authoritarianism and dictatorship, 1 that was sponsored by US intervention. Yet the entreaty of “strong hand” governance is little astir ideology than astir disillusionment with parties and governments that consciousness distant and self-serving. When elites disregard citizens’ needs, toughness is performed, replacing governmental representation. The subject is politicised and nine is militarised. From this shift, it is simply a abbreviated measurement to a symbiosis successful which politicians and uniforms support predatory interests, section oregon foreign, nether the banner of security, arsenic authoritarian arrangements instrumentality clasp and soldiers person “warrior dividends”.
The instrumentality of hard-line populism successful the region, arsenic good arsenic unfastened US subject involution and bombing, resonates with a wider revival of militarised responses to societal and governmental problems. The revival of the Monroe Doctrine successful the Caribbean, the breach of planetary instrumentality and the usage of sheer force, the alleged “Don Doctrine”, constituent to a governing logic that substitutes coercion for governmental legitimacy. Financial pressure, disposable successful Argentina’s astir caller legislative elections, and the summary execution of alleged cause traffickers travel the aforesaid pattern. These are not isolated phenomena but variations of the aforesaid response: the gaslighting of societal problems done force. Ultimately, this produces fragile states, fragmented societies and politicised militaries that undermine the precise capableness needed to present safety, fairness and democracy, making outer interference easier, not harder.
As leaders successful the portion prosecute militarisation arsenic a means of repressing dissent, they weaken states and presumption countries overmuch arsenic they were erstwhile banana republics archetypal emerged. Weak institutions, corrupted legislatures and politicised information forces erstwhile again specify governmental life. Today, the publication is updated, much overt, earthy and transactional, arsenic the missiles and the aftermath of the abduction of Nicolas Maduro successful Venezuela illustrate.
A antithetic way is possible, but it begins by describing the occupation correctly. Violence is real, yet information without legitimacy is ephemeral, and unit without institution-building is brittle. The Andes volition not flight the existent inclination of insecurity and instability by doubling down connected exigency powers, larger prisons and sweeping the streets with soldiers successful afloat gear. The lone mode to bypass this way is to put successful justness and tackle the institutionalised inequalities that marque unit feasible and profitable. This cannot hap without recasting governmental practice distant from existent predatory dynamics.
If the portion continues the chant of right-wing populism successful 2026, it volition spot much states of emergency, much “internal conflicts” and much militarised campaigns, and inevitably much country for overseas actors to acceptable the presumption and priorities successful the region. A reboot of banana republics with a “security” add-on. It mightiness adjacent manus the US president the geopolitical equivalent of a “FIFA Peace Prize”, thing that resembles a prize for the show of success, but that yet fails successful existent life. The lone mode retired of this trajectory is to guarantee that authorities takes spot without the shadiness of a azygous and populism, and that citizens’ voices are not eclipsed by the interests of cliques and short-sighted elites. This task volition beryllium much hard fixed the pressures from the US for transactional deals that bash not attraction for democracy, quality rights oregon legitimacy.
The views expressed successful this nonfiction are the author’s ain and bash not needfully bespeak Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

2 hours ago
3









English (US) ·