BBC ‘determined to fight’ Trump lawsuit over Panorama documentary

1 month ago 16

The BBC has announced it volition equine a defence against a defamation suit threatened by United States President Donald Trump, expected to beryllium filed this week.

On Monday, Samir Shah, the seat of the BBC’s board, said the British broadcaster is prepared to combat immoderate ailment the president files.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“I privation to beryllium precise wide with you — our presumption has not changed. There is nary ground for a defamation case, and we are determined to combat this,” Shah wrote successful a missive to BBC staff.

The missive follows an announcement connected Friday from President Trump, saying that helium planned to proceed with a suit successful the coming days.

“We’ll writer them for anyplace between a cardinal and $5bn, astir apt immoderate clip adjacent week,” Trump told reporters connected Air Force One. “I deliberation I person to bash it.”

The contention stems from the editing of a documentary for the investigative tv bid Panorama, titled Trump: A Second Chance?

The documentary aired successful October 2024, days earlier Trump won his 2nd word arsenic president that November.

Trump and his allies person alleged that the Panorama documentary sought to misrepresent his statements connected January 6, 2021, erstwhile a radical of his supporters violently stormed the US Capitol successful an effort to disrupt the certification of the 2020 election.

The Republican person had mislaid that predetermination to his Democratic rival Joe Biden. But helium has falsely maintained that his decision was owed to wide elector fraud.

The Panorama documentary edited unneurotic 2 abstracted quotes from Trump’s code connected the time of the riot that were delivered astir an hr apart.

Together, they appeared to amusement Trump encouraging his supporters to “fight similar hell” aft walking down to the Capitol.

Trump and his supporters accidental that the edit was misleading and that it leaves retired captious context. At 1 constituent successful the speech, for example, Trump told his supporters “to peacefully and patriotically marque your voices heard”.

Trump besides followed his entreaty to locomotion down to the Capitol by calling connected his supporters to “cheer connected our brave senators and Congressmen and women”.

Tumult astatine the BBC

The contention implicit the documentary has roiled the BBC astatine a clip erstwhile the broadcaster faces allegations of interior bias, leaked to the media.

Earlier this month, The Daily Telegraph published an interior BBC memo successful which a erstwhile adviser, Michael Prescott, expressed interest astir “systemic problems” successful the broadcaster’s sum of hot-button topics, including transgender rights and Israel’s warfare connected Gaza, which experts person identified arsenic a genocide.

The BBC has repeatedly denied organization bias, and its enactment has stood by the prime of its reporting.

But the scrutiny has led to a shake-up successful the broadcaster’s leadership. On November 9, its manager wide Tim Davie and its quality caput Deborah Turness some resigned successful abstracted letters to BBC staff.

“Overall the BBC is delivering well, but determination person been immoderate mistakes made and arsenic manager wide I person to instrumentality eventual responsibility,” Davie wrote successful his letter.

“Our organisation is simply a captious constituent of a steadfast society, arsenic good arsenic a thriving originative sector. We should champion it, not weaponise it.”

Last week, amid Trump’s threats of a lawsuit, the BBC issued a “personal letter” of apology to the US president.

It said Shah and the BBC were “sorry for the edit of the President’s speech”, according to a spokesperson’s statement. It besides confirmed that the documentary would not beryllium rebroadcast.

But Shah and the BBC nevertheless stood steadfast against the imaginable of a lawsuit.

“While the BBC sincerely regrets the mode successful which the video clip was edited, we powerfully disagree determination is simply a ground for a defamation claim,” the connection said.

A past of suing the quality media

Trump has a past of pursuing ineligible claims against quality media helium finds disfavourable, adjacent erstwhile experts accidental his claims deficiency ineligible merit.

Last year, for instance, Trump filed a defamation suit against ABC News aft an anchor successful a unrecorded interrogation incorrectly said the US president had been “found liable for rape”.

He had been recovered liable for intersexual abuse, not rape, successful a civilian lawsuit brought by writer E Jean Carroll.

ABC News agreed to wage $15m to settee the lawsuit successful December 2024.

Trump besides sued CBS News for its editing of an interrogation with his 2024 predetermination rival, Democrat Kamala Harris, connected the TV programme 60 Minutes.

In July, CBS’s genitor institution Paramount agreed to a colony of $16m, which came arsenic the institution sought the Trump administration’s support to proceed with a merger.

Last month, Trump besides refiled a abstracted defamation suit against The New York Times, 1 period aft a national justice threw it out.

In Monday’s letter, BBC seat Shah noted the outgo specified a suit could nonstop connected the BBC and its viewers, who wage a licensing interest to ticker its products.

“In each this we are, of course, acutely alert of the privilege of our backing and the request to support our licence interest payers, the British public,” Shah wrote.

Legal experts judge Trump’s claims against the BBC face an uphill battle, peculiarly successful the US, wherever the First Amendment of the Constitution includes beardown safeguards for the quality media.

Read Entire Article