Budget 2025: Reeves fighting claims she 'lied' about deficit

Rachel Reeves is warring claims that she "lied" to the nationalist astir the authorities of the finances successful the run-up to past week's fund - successful which she raised £26bn successful taxes.

It follows a missive published by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the authoritative watchdog which draws up forecasts for the Treasury, published connected Friday.

In it, OBR seat Richard Hughes (who is already nether occurrence for the leak of the budget measures) said he'd taken the antithetic measurement of revealing the forecasts it had submitted to Rachel Reeves successful the 10 weeks earlier the budget, and which is usually shrouded successful secrecy.

The missive reveals this timeline, which has plunged the chancellor into trouble:

17 September - archetypal forecast

At this point, it was already known that the UK's maturation forecast would beryllium downgraded. The chancellor was told that the "increases successful existent wages and inflation" would offset the interaction of the downgrade. The shortage forecast by the extremity of the parliament was £2.5bn.

20 October - 2nd forecast

By this point, that shortage had turned into a tiny surplus of £2.1bn - i.e. the productivity downgrade has been wiped retired and "both of the government's fiscal targets were connected people to beryllium met".

31 October - 3rd forecast

The last 1 earlier the Treasury enactment guardant its measures. The finances were present nett affirmative with a £4.2bn surplus.

But the accusation is that Rachel Reeves was presenting an wholly antithetic representation - that she had a important achromatic spread which needed to beryllium filled.

13 October

Ms Reeves tells Sky's lawman governmental exertion Sam Coates the productivity downgrade has been challenging but added: "I won't duck those challenges. Of people we're looking astatine taxation and spending."

👉 Click present to perceive to Electoral Dysfunction connected your podcast app 👈

27 October

With the Treasury present alert the shortage had been wiped out, the Financial Times was briefed astir a "£20bn deed to nationalist finances."

4 November

Ms Reeves gave a dawn quality league successful Downing Street, mounting the signifier for taxation rises. She says she wants radical "to recognize the circumstances we are facing... productivity show is weaker than antecedently thought," adding that "we volition each person to contribute".

10 November

Ms Reeves tells BBC 5Live that sticking to Labour's promises not to rise taxes would necessitate "things similar heavy cuts successful superior spending". The signifier seemed acceptable for the atomic enactment - the archetypal income taxation emergence successful decades.

13 November

After headlines astir a crippled to oust Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the Financial Times reported that the chancellor had dropped plans to rise income taxation due to the fact that of improved forecasts [which we present cognize hadn't changed since 31 October], putting the achromatic spread person to £20bn than £30bn.

The premier minister's spokesperson has insisted Rachel Reeves did not mislead voters and acceptable retired her choices, and the reasons for them, astatine the budget.

But the contented has had tremendous cut-through, with newspapers giving it apical billing.

The Sun's Saturday beforehand leafage header - "Chancer of the Exchequer - fury astatine Reeves 'lies' implicit £30bn achromatic hole" - volition not person been pleasant speechmaking for ministers.

She present has questions to reply astir the chaotic run-up to the fund - of briefing and counter-briefing, which critics accidental present makes small sense.

Tory person Kemi Badenoch said connected Saturday: "We person learned that the chancellor misrepresented the OBR's forecasts. She sold her 'Benefits Street' fund connected a lie. Honesty matters... she has to go."

Economist Paul Johnson, erstwhile manager of the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), told The Times the chancellor's 4 November quality briefing "probably was misleading. It was intelligibly intended to person an interaction and corroborate what autarkic forecasters similar [the National Institute of Economic and Social Research] and the IFS had been saying.

"It was designed to corroborate a communicative that determination was a fiscal spread that needed to beryllium filled with important taxation rises. In fact, arsenic she knew astatine the time, nary specified spread existed."

Read much connected fund fallout:
Reeves accused implicit forecasts
Hospitality 'needs a lifeline'

Rachel Reeves is doing a circular of greeting interviews connected Sunday successful which she'll beryllium grilled implicit which of her fund measures volition make economical maturation (which the authorities claimed was its fig 1 priority), wherefore they person been incapable to tackle rising payment spending and present astir wherefore markets and voters were near confused by dire warnings.

She whitethorn assertion that she ne'er personally said determination was a circumstantial £30bn achromatic spread oregon that the other headroom generated by the taxation rises volition guarantee she does not person to travel backmost for much adjacent year.

In an interrogation with The Saturday's Guardian, Ms Reeves said she had "chosen to support nationalist spending" connected schools and hospitals successful the budget.

She confirmed an income taxation emergence had been looked at, and insisted that OBR forecasts "move around" aft the Treasury has submitted its planned measures. There are plentifulness much questions to come.