Did Tony Blair influence trial of UK soldiers accused of killing Iraqi man?

3 hours ago 4

The United Kingdom’s relation successful the Iraq war has travel nether the spotlight erstwhile again, arsenic recently released UK authorities files look to suggest that erstwhile Prime Minister Tony Blair pressured officials to guarantee British soldiers accused of mistreating Iraqi civilians during the warfare would not beryllium tried successful civilian courts.

Documents released connected Tuesday to the National Archives successful Kew, westbound London, uncover that successful 2005, Blair said it was “essential” that courts similar the International Criminal Court (ICC) did not analyse UK actions successful Iraq.

What bash recently released documents show?

On December 30, the UK Cabinet Office released much than 600 documents to the National Archives astatine Kew. According to the UK’s Public Records Act 1958, the authorities is required to merchandise records of humanities worth to the National Archives aft 20 years.

According to the National Archives website, astir of the recently added documents subordinate to the policies implemented by the Blair authorities betwixt 2004 and 2005, from home decisions to guarantee the UK would not interruption up by delegating powerfulness to Wales and Scotland, to overseas argumentation decisions connected Iraq and different countries.

According to UK media reports, the declassified files grounds that Blair told Antony Phillipson, his backstage caput for overseas affairs astatine the time, that it was “essential” that civilian courts did not prosecute British soldiers accused of abusing Iraqi civilians successful their custody during the warfare successful Iraq.

“We have, successful effect, to beryllium successful a presumption wherever the ICC is not progressive and neither is CPS (UK Crown Prosecution Service),” helium said successful a written memo. “That is essential.”

According to UK media reports, Blair’s comments followed a written memo Phillipson sent him successful July 2005 astir a gathering betwixt the country’s lawyer wide astatine the clip and 2 erstwhile UK subject chiefs. He wrote that they had discussed the lawsuit of British soldiers who were accused of beating an Iraqi edifice receptionist, Baha Mousa, to death.

Mousa, who was killed successful September 2003 successful Basra, Iraq, had been successful the custody of UK troops.

According to records among the recently declassified documents, Phillipson told Blair that the lawsuit would beryllium 1 which would extremity with a tribunal martial. But helium added that “if the Attorney General felt that the lawsuit was amended dealt with successful a civilian court, helium could nonstop accordingly”.

“It indispensable not,” Blair stressed.

Christopher Featherstone, subordinate lecturer astatine the Department of Politics, University of York, said: “Blair didn’t privation prosecution done planetary law, and wanted subject justness – helium saw this arsenic little punitive successful the punishments – and helium didn’t privation the cognition that the subject couldn’t run efficaciously successful warfare zones.”

Featherstone told Al Jazeera that the Iraq warfare has go synonymous successful UK authorities with Blair and his legacy.

“He [Blair] was convinced that helium could transportation the British nationalist of the rightness of the Iraq war, some morally and strategically. However, this became much and much hard to achieve. As such, helium was precise acrophobic astir imaginable prosecution for UK soldiers arsenic this would lone amplify absorption to the war, astatine location and abroad,” helium said.

What was the UK’s relation successful the Iraq war?

The Blair authorities justified the UK’s determination to enactment the US penetration of Iraq successful 2003 utilizing now-debunked claims that Iraq had weapons of wide destruction. The UK said its purpose was to destruct these and to liberate the radical of Iraq from the regularisation of then-President Saddam Hussein.

In 2003, the US sent much than 100,000 soldiers, the UK sent astir 46,000, Australia sent 2,000, and Poland sent astir 194 peculiar forces members.

But determination was a large woody of nationalist statement successful the UK astir the legality of going to warfare successful Iraq connected the ground of what was suspected to beryllium flawed grounds astir weapons of wide destruction.

Featherstone, who wrote the publication The Road to War successful Iraq: Comparative Foreign Policy Analysis, said Blair was “frustrated” by worries from officials astir the legality of going to warfare successful Iraq.

“From the interviews I carried retired for my publication research, elder subject and civilian servants were disquieted astir the legality and asked for reassurance from the lawyer general. However, Blair was frustrated astatine each the treatment of the legality of the invasion,” helium said.

“Blair saw the UK relation arsenic showing the planetary enactment for the US warfare connected terror, and saw his idiosyncratic relation arsenic gathering the lawsuit for the penetration of Iraq and the toppling of Saddam,” helium added.

Speaking to the media successful July 2016 aft the merchandise of the Chilcot report – a British nationalist enquiry into the UK’s relation successful the Iraq warfare – Blair said joining the penetration had been “the hardest decision” helium had ever taken during his tenure arsenic premier minister.

The Chilcot report concluded that determination had been nary “imminent threat” from Saddam Hussein and said the quality astir weapons of wide demolition successful Iraq was “not justified”.

Blair acknowledged that the quality was incorrect but said invading Iraq was nevertheless the “right decision” astatine the time, arsenic Saddam Hussein was a “threat to satellite peace”.

“The satellite was and is, successful my judgement, a amended spot without Saddam Hussein,” Blair told journalists successful reply to the findings of the Chilcot report.

However, helium apologised to families who were bereaved during the warfare and said that “no words tin decently convey the grief and sorrow of those who mislaid ones they loved successful Iraq – whether our equipped forces, the equipped forces of different nations oregon Iraqis”.

Did UK soldiers maltreatment Iraqis during the war?

There is simply a ample magnitude of grounds showing that they did.

Rights groups, including Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), person documented cases of UK soldiers abusing hundreds of Iraqi civilians successful their custody during the war.

“Their testimonies [Iraqi civilians] amusement a signifier of convulsive beatings, slumber and sensory deprivation, ‘stress positions’, deprivation of nutrient and water, intersexual and spiritual humiliation, and, successful immoderate cases, intersexual abuse,” the ECCHR said successful a study successful 2020.

In 2005, 3 UK soldiers were tried by tribunal martial astatine a British subject basal successful bluish Germany, wherever photographs showing grounds of the abuses they engaged successful had been produced. The soldiers denied the charges but were recovered blameworthy of abusing Iraqi civilians during the warfare and were dismissed from the army.

In 2007, Corporal Donald Payne became the archetypal British worker to beryllium sentenced. He went to situation for a twelvemonth aft being court-martialled by the service for mistreating Iraqi prisoners during the war.

Payne was progressive successful the decease of the Iraqi civilian and edifice receptionist Baha Mousa, who died successful 2003 aft enduring 93 beatings.

Has the ICC intervened?

In 2005, the ICC opened an enquiry into the UK’s relation successful the Iraq war, but closed it successful February 2006 erstwhile ICC judges agreed that the lawsuit did not autumn into the apical court’s jurisdiction.

However, the enquiry was reopened successful May 2014 by ICC authoritative Fatou Bensouda aft rights groups submitted grounds of UK soldiers’ systematic abuse, including execution and torture, of Iraqi civilians during the war.

But successful December 2020, Bensouda abandoned the inquiry, saying that portion determination was “reasonable ground to believe” that “members of the British equipped forces committed the warfare crimes of wilful killing, torture, inhuman/cruel treatment, outrages upon idiosyncratic dignity, and rape and/or different forms of intersexual violence”, the UK authorities had not tried to artifact investigations into the case.

In a 184-page report, Bensouda’s bureau said successful December 2020: “If shielding had been made out, an probe by my Office would person been warranted. Following a elaborate inquiry, and contempt the concerns expressed successful its report, the bureau [of the prosecutor] could not substantiate allegations that the UK investigative and prosecutorial bodies had engaged successful shielding [ie, blocking inquiries], based connected a cautious scrutiny of the accusation earlier it.

“Having exhausted tenable lines of enquiry arising from the accusation available, I truthful determined that the lone professionally due determination astatine this signifier is to adjacent the preliminary introspection and to pass the senders of communications. My determination is without prejudice to a reconsideration based connected caller facts oregon evidence,” she added.

The prosecutor’s determination has been condemned by rights groups.

“The UK authorities has repeatedly shown precious small involvement successful investigating and prosecuting atrocities committed overseas by British troops,” Clive Baldwin, elder ineligible advisor astatine Human Rights Watch said successful a connection successful December 2020.

“The prosecutor’s determination to adjacent her UK enquiry volition doubtless substance perceptions of an disfigured treble modular successful justice, with 1 attack for almighty states and rather different for those with little clout,” helium added.

What did Blair accidental astir the ICC?

Tuesday’s declassified documents person revealed that Blair was assured the ICC would not prosecute UK soldiers.

According to the documents, successful June 2002, a period earlier the ICC statute entered into unit and astir a twelvemonth earlier the UK joined the Iraq war, Blair had told John Howard, the Australian premier curate astatine the time, that countries similar the UK had nary crushed to fearfulness the ICC.

The Rome Statue of the ICC is the apical court’s main pact which states that the ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for superior crimes including crimes against humanity and engaging successful committing a genocide.

Blair wrote to Howard aft officials successful Australia expressed fears astir the ICC’s jurisdiction, arsenic Australia had besides joined the US and UK successful the Iraq war.

But Blair reassured Howard successful his missive that the apical tribunal “acts lone successful the lawsuit of failed states oregon wherever judicial processes person breached down”.

“We judge that liable antiauthoritarian states, wherever the regularisation of instrumentality is respected, person thing to fearfulness from the ICC,” helium wrote.

According to UK media reports, Blair’s medication had agreed to motion the ICC’s Rome Statute successful 1998 aft the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Office negotiated with the tribunal that “the tribunal [ICC] whitethorn lone enactment erstwhile nationalist ineligible systems are incapable oregon unwilling to bash so”.

“It’s surely existent that the ICC has historically been accused of being biased successful presumption of wherever it has focused its attraction and effort successful investigating and prosecuting cases,” Featherstone said.

“However, determination are immoderate reasons for this astir resources for investigating, the quality to bring the cases to fruition, and the comparative powerfulness of those being accused,” helium added.

Read Entire Article