Geoeconomic confrontation world’s top threat, global leaders say

World Economic Forum survey says economical tools utilized arsenic geopolitical weapons the astir pressing hazard to planetary stability.

“Geoeconomic confrontation” looms arsenic the astir pressing planetary menace facing the satellite successful the abbreviated term, according to decision-makers surveyed successful a World Economic Forum (WEF) report.

The organisation’s yearly Global Risks Report, released connected Wednesday, polled much than 1,300 experts worldwide astir the top risks to planetary stability.

Recommended Stories

• list 1 of 4Trump says immoderate state doing concern with Iran volition look 25 percent tariff
• list 2 of 4Trump says commercialized statement with Mexico, Canada ‘irrelevant’ to US
• list 3 of 4How volition Trump’s caller 25% tariff interaction Iran’s trading partners?
• list 4 of 4China’s commercialized surplus hits caller heights successful 2025 contempt US tariff war

Eighteen percent of those surveyed identified “geoeconomic confrontation” – involving the usage of trade, investment, sanctions and concern argumentation arsenic strategical weapons to constrain geopolitical rivals and consolidate spheres of power – arsenic the astir apt trigger of a planetary situation wrong the adjacent 2 years.

Saadia Zahidi – managing manager of the WEF yearly gathering successful Davos, Switzerland, which is ‍due to commencement adjacent week – cited rising tariffs, checks connected overseas concern and tighter proviso controls connected resources similar captious minerals arsenic examples of “geoeconomic confrontation”.

“[It ⁠is] erstwhile economical argumentation tools go fundamentally weaponry alternatively than a ground of cooperation,” she said astatine an online quality conference.

While the study did not sanction circumstantial countries, the category’s emergence from ninth successful past year’s study to the apical spot reflects a twelvemonth marked by renewed commercialized wars betwixt rival powers sparked arsenic the medication of President Donald Trump successful the United States imposed aggressive tariffs connected trading partners.

The study said the hazard of geoeconomic confrontation is rising arsenic the satellite enters a caller “age of competition” with economical tools progressively weaponised arsenic extensions of geopolitical strategy amid a broader retreat from multilateralism.

“Protectionism, strategical concern argumentation and progressive power by governments implicit captious proviso chains each awesome a satellite increasing much intensely competitive,” the study said.

Economic rivalries are coming to the fore, it said, arsenic concerns turn implicit “an economical downturn, rising ostentation and imaginable plus bubbles arsenic countries look precocious indebtedness burdens and volatile markets”.

The study ranked misinformation and disinformation, and societal polarisation arsenic the 2nd and 3rd astir pressing threats successful the abbreviated term.

Environment-related concerns were ranked the top menace implicit a 10-year play with utmost weather, biodiversity nonaccomplishment and ecosystem collapse, and captious alteration to world systems considered the gravest semipermanent risks.

In a connection accompanying the merchandise of the report, Peter Giger, radical main hazard serviceman astatine Zurich Insurance Group and a subordinate of the report’s advisory board, said that with specified “a analyzable premix of interacting risks” demanding attention, superior threats specified arsenic the hazard to captious infrastructure appeared “underplayed”.

The survey rated disruptions to captious infrastructure – specified arsenic energy, h2o and integer systems – arsenic the 22nd biggest hazard implicit the adjacent 2 years and 23rd implicit the adjacent 10, helium noted.

“That’s strikingly debased for thing truthful cardinal to modern life,” helium said, calling it “a unsafe oversight”.