The Trump medication is facing a governmental and ineligible firestorm implicit reports that its subject carried retired a 2nd onslaught connected a vessel successful the Caribbean Sea that Washington claims was carrying drugs, aft 2 radical survived the archetypal attack.
At the bosom of the contention are 2 questions: Who ordered the 2nd onslaught connected the vessel successful September, and was it legal?
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Is US President Donald Trump preparing to onslaught Venezuela?
- list 2 of 3Al Jazeera reports from reopened US basal arsenic Venezuela tensions rise
- list 3 of 3Maduro rejects a ‘slave’s peace’ for Venezuela arsenic US ramps up pressure
Here’s what we know:
What happened?
On September 2, 2025, the US subject struck a vessel successful the Caribbean during Operation Southern Spear, a large run that the medication of President Donald Trump claims is aimed at dismantling drug-trafficking networks.
The first strike destroyed the vas and killed 9 people. Two survivors were near clinging to the debris.
According to The Washington Post, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a verbal instruction, which its reporting described arsenic an bid “to termination everybody”.
The mission’s commander, Admiral Frank Bradley, past ordered a 2nd onslaught – 1 that killed the 2 survivors.
Experts person called the 2nd onslaught – what successful subject jargon is known arsenic a “double tap” onslaught – illegal. The strikes person drawn disapproval not conscionable from Democrats but from respective Republicans successful Congress, who person pledged to pb investigations into what happened.
The Republican-led Senate Armed Services Committee announced connected Friday that it planned to guarantee “oversight” connected the strikes. “The Committee is alert of caller quality reports – and the Department of Defense’s archetypal effect – regarding alleged follow-on strikes connected suspected narcotics vessels successful the SOUTHCOM country of responsibility,” the committee’s chairs, Republican Senator Roger Wicker and Democratic Senator Jack Reed, said successful a statement. “The Committee has directed inquiries to the Department, and we volition beryllium conducting vigorous oversight to find the facts related to these circumstances,” they said.
The House Armed Services Committee separately said it was seeking “a afloat accounting of the cognition successful question”.
Congressional committees person sought audio recordings and different grounds to portion unneurotic however the bid was given.
So far, the broader US cognition successful the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean has killed more than 80 people and targeted much than 20 boats.
What has Pete Hegseth said?
Hegseth called the study “fake news” connected societal media, saying the vessel strikes were “in compliance with the instrumentality of equipped struggle – and approved by the champion subject and civilian lawyers, up and down the concatenation of command”.
But helium besides appeared to warrant the double-strike.
“The declared intent is to halt lethal drugs, destruct narco-boats, and termination the narco-terrorists who are poisoning the American people,” Hegseth said successful a societal media post connected Friday evening. “Every trafficker we termination is affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization.”
Earlier this year, the Trump medication formally labelled the Venezuelan pack Tren de Aragua a violent group. It besides accused Venezuela’s president, Nicolas Maduro, of starring the Cartel de los Soles – which US officials picture arsenic a drug-smuggling web involving elder figures successful the country’s authorities and equipped forces.
In reality, the Cartel de los Solos is not a cartel – conscionable a wide word utilized by Venezuelans for corrupt elder officials. And the US administration’s ain Drug Enforcement Agency lists different countries – not Venezuela – arsenic the large sources of narcotics entering the US. While Trump has repeatedly claimed that Tren de Aragua is simply a beforehand for Maduro, his ain quality agencies person concluded that determination is nary nexus betwixt the pack and the Venezuelan president.
As usual, the fake quality is delivering much fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our unthinkable warriors warring to support the homeland.
As we’ve said from the beginning, and successful each statement, these highly effectual strikes are specifically…
— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) November 28, 2025
Have Trump and the White House contradicted each other?
Answering questions connected Air Force One connected Sunday, Trump said his medication “will look into” the reports of the 2nd onslaught connected the vessel connected September 2.
But helium added that “I wouldn’t person wanted that – not a 2nd strike.”
He noted that Hegseth told him “he did not bid the decease of those 2 men.”
In the astir 2 twelve consequent strikes by the US subject connected boats, US troops have, successful respective cases, helped rescue survivors and person past repatriated them to the countries they beryllium to.
However, successful opposition to Trump’s statement, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed Hegseth successful justifying the 2nd onslaught connected September 2.
“The onslaught conducted connected September 2nd was conducted successful self-defence to support Americans and captious United States interests. The onslaught was conducted successful planetary waters and successful accordance with the instrumentality of equipped conflict,” she said, successful effect to a question from a newsman connected Monday evening.
So who approved the strike?
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth authorized aggregate strikes that killed 11 radical connected a vas from Venezuela allegedly carrying amerciable narcotics successful September, the White House said https://t.co/panDtNSmVQ pic.twitter.com/pMJkyAvt2E
— Reuters (@Reuters) December 2, 2025
According to the White House, Hegseth authorised Admiral Bradley to transportation retired the September 2 “strikes” – suggesting that the defence caput gave the ngo commandant the go-ahead to transportation retired aggregate attacks connected the vessel if needed.
“Secretary Hegseth authorised Admiral Bradley to behaviour these kinetic strikes,” Leavitt told a media briefing connected Monday.
But the existent determination to transportation retired the 2nd onslaught was Bradley’s, Leavitt said.
“Admiral Bradley worked good wrong his authorization and the law. He directed the engagement to guarantee the vessel was destroyed and the menace of narco-terrorists to the United States was wholly eliminated,” she said.
US Navy Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley, incoming commander, US Special Operations Command, delivers remarks during the USSOCOM Change of Command Ceremony successful Tampa, Florida, US, October 3, 2025 [Reuters]Why the question of who ordered it matters
According to experts, a 2nd onslaught sidesplitting survivors was illegal.
“Instead of having owed process and a transgression prosecution, the Trump medication has decided to beryllium judge, assemblage and executioner, and connected their ain assertion that these individuals are carrying drugs, ordering them killed, which is extrajudicial killing, which is murder,” Rachel VanLandingham, a subject adept astatine Southwestern Law School, told Al Jazeera.
“That 2nd onslaught against individuals who are shipwrecked, clinging desperately to the broadside of their vessel wreckage – that’s a warfare crime. It’s a warfare transgression due to the fact that those individuals who are shipwrecked person protected presumption nether the instrumentality unless they were, for example, shooting a weapon astatine somebody. But, otherwise, they’re protected,” she added.
Legally, the US tin lone usage unit if there’s a existent threat, truthful identifying the decision-maker is cardinal to judging whether the onslaught followed the rules, said experts.

50 minutes ago
3









English (US) ·