Musician Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs sentenced to four years in prison after apology

The famed hip-hop mogul told the tribunal that his actions were ‘disgusting’ and ‘shameful’ successful a plea for leniency.

Musician and shaper Sean “Diddy” Combs has been sentenced to 4 years and 2 months successful situation for transporting radical crossed authorities lines for intersexual encounters.

His sentencing proceeding connected Friday capped a national lawsuit that featured harrowing grounds and ended successful a forceful reckoning for 1 of the astir fashionable figures successful hip-hop. Combs, 55, was besides fined fractional a cardinal dollars.

Recommended Stories

• list 1 of 3Deadly protests successful Pakistan-administered Kashmir implicit surviving costs
• list 2 of 3Hamas says it agrees to parts of Trump’s Gaza program but seeks much talks
• list 3 of 3Police accidental 1 unfortunate perchance changeable by serviceman during Manchester attack

Since Combs has served a twelvemonth successful jailhouse already, helium is expected to beryllium released successful astir 3 years. His lawyers wanted him freed instantly and said the clip down bars has already forced him to clasp remorse and sobriety.

He was convicted successful July of flying his girlfriends and antheral enactment workers astir the state to prosecute successful drug-fuelled intersexual encounters, a signifier that happened implicit galore years and successful antithetic locations. However, helium was acquitted of enactment trafficking and racketeering charges that could person enactment him down bars for life.

“Why did it hap truthful long?” US District Judge Arun Subramanian asked arsenic helium handed down the sentence. “Because you had the powerfulness and the resources to support it going, and due to the fact that you weren’t caught.”

Combs showed nary disposable alteration of emotion arsenic helium learned his sentence, sitting successful his seat and looking consecutive up arsenic the justice spoke. He remained subdued afterwards and appeared dejected, with nary of the enthusiasm and smiles that accompanied his interactions with lawyers and his household earlier successful the day.

In a last connection earlier sentencing, Combs told the justice his years of behaviour were “disgusting, shameful” and apologised to the radical helium had wounded physically and mentally. He said his acts of home unit were a load helium would person to transportation for the remainder of his life.

His defence lawyers played an 11-minute video successful tribunal portraying Combs’ household life, vocation and philanthropy. At 1 constituent during the video, Combs enactment a manus connected his look and began to cry.

His astir two-month proceedings successful a national tribunal successful Manhattan featured grounds from women who said Combs had beaten, threatened, sexually assaulted and blackmailed them. Prosecutor Christy Slavik told the justice that sparing Combs superior situation clip would excuse years of violence.

“It’s a lawsuit astir a antheral who did horrible things to existent radical to fulfill his ain intersexual gratification,” she said. “He didn’t request the money. His currency was control.”

Combs was convicted nether the Mann Act, which bans transporting radical crossed authorities lines for prostitution. Defence lawyer Jason Driscoll argued the instrumentality was misapplied.

During grounds astatine the trial, erstwhile woman Casandra “Cassie” Ventura told jurors that Combs ordered her to person “disgusting” enactment with strangers hundreds of times during their decade-long relationship. Jurors saw video of him dragging and beating her successful a Los Angeles edifice hallway.

Another woman, identified arsenic “Jane”, testified she was pressured into enactment with antheral workers during drug-fuelled “hotel nights” portion Combs watched and sometimes filmed.

The lone accuser scheduled to talk Friday, a erstwhile adjunct known arsenic “Mia”, withdrew aft defence objections. She has accused Combs of raping her successful 2010 and asked the justice for a condemnation that reflects “the ongoing information my abuser poses”.