Supreme Court rules in lenders' favour in car finance case - in blow to motorists

British banks and lenders person been spared a immense measure arsenic the Supreme Court has overturned a ruling that could person meant millions of motorists were owed compensation for mis-sold car finance.

However the tribunal sided with 1 of the claimants, Marcus Johnson, and awarded him idiosyncratic compensation owed to the circumstances successful his lawsuit - but connected different points the tribunal overturned a Court of Appeal ruling that the customers had a case.

The judgement is apt to importantly bounds the scope of imaginable payouts to motorists aft the Court of Appeal past twelvemonth ruled "secret" committee payments to car dealers arsenic portion of concern arrangements without the buyer's afloat informed consent were unlawful.

The tribunal recovered 3 motorists, including Mr Johnson, had not been told intelligibly oregon astatine each that the car dealers, acting arsenic recognition brokers, would person a committee from the lenders for introducing concern to them.

The drivers had each bought their cars earlier 2021 and the tribunal said they should person compensation.

Read more: What is the car concern scandal?

Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, took the enactment to the Supreme Court and said astatine a three-day proceeding successful April that the determination was an "egregious error".

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) besides intervened successful the lawsuit and told the UK's highest tribunal that the Court of Appeal ruling "goes excessively far", portion the 3 motorists opposed the challenge.

Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs and Hamble handed down their judgement this afternoon.

Some drivers could inactive person compensation though, arsenic a abstracted lawsuit connected car concern is ongoing astatine the FCA.

What does the 2nd lawsuit involve?

The 2nd lawsuit focuses connected discretionary committee arrangements (DCAs) - a signifier banned by the FCA successful 2021.

Under these arrangements, brokers and dealers accrued the magnitude of involvement they earned without telling buyers and received much committee for it. This is said to person past incentivised sellers to maximise involvement rates.

In January 2024, the FCA announced a reappraisal into whether centrifugal concern customers had been overcharged due to the fact that of past usage of DCAs.

It is utilizing its powers to reappraisal humanities centrifugal concern committee arrangements crossed aggregate firms - each of whom contradict acting inappropriately.

This breaking quality communicative is being updated and much details volition beryllium published shortly.

Please refresh the leafage for the latest version.

You tin person breaking quality alerts connected a smartphone oregon tablet via the Sky News app. You tin besides follow america connected WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to support up with the latest news.