2 days ago
3
The United States onslaught connected Venezuela connected January 3 should beryllium understood not simply arsenic an unlawful usage of force, but arsenic portion of a broader displacement towards nihilistic geopolitics successful which planetary instrumentality is openly subordinated to imperial absorption of planetary security. What is astatine involvement is not lone Venezuela’s sovereignty, but the illness of immoderate remaining assurance successful the capableness of the United Nations system, and peculiarly the imperishable members of the Security Council, to restrain aggression, forestall genocide, oregon uphold the halfway ineligible norms they assertion to defend.
The subject intervention, its governmental aftermath, and the accompanying rhetoric of US enactment unneurotic exposure a strategy successful which legality is invoked selectively, veto powerfulness substitutes for accountability, and coercion replaces consent. Venezuela frankincense becomes some a lawsuit survey and a warning: not of the nonaccomplishment of planetary instrumentality arsenic such, but of its deliberate marginalisation by those states entrusted with managing planetary security.
From the standpoint of planetary law, this enactment constitutes a crude, brazen, unlawful and unprovoked recourse to assertive force, successful wide usurpation of the halfway norm of the UN Charter, Article 2(4), which reads: “All Members of the United Nations shall refrain successful their planetary relations from the menace oregon usage of unit against the territorial integrity oregon governmental independency of immoderate state.” The lone qualification to this prohibition is acceptable retired successful Article 51: “Nothing successful the contiguous Charter shall impair the inherent close of idiosyncratic oregon corporate self-defence if an equipped onslaught occurs against a Member of the United Nations.” This flagrant usurpation of Venezuelan territorial sovereignty and governmental independency was preceded by years of US sanctions, weeks of explicit threats, and caller lethal attacks connected vessels allegedly transporting drugs, arsenic good arsenic seizures of tankers carrying Venezuelan oil.
This unilateral enactment was further aggravated by the seizure of Venezuela’s caput of state, Nicolas Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, by US Special Forces, reportedly guided by the CIA, to look charges of “narco-terrorism” successful a US national court, successful evident usurpation of sovereign immunity. This imperial posture, openly disregarding the immunity of overseas leaders, was underscored by President Trump’s declared volition to nonstop Venezuelan policymaking for an indefinite period, ostensibly until the state was “stabilised” sufficiently to reconstruct lipid accumulation nether the auspices of large US corporations, including Chevron, Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips. When asked who was successful complaint of Venezuela’s governance, Trump responded impatiently, “We are successful charge.”
There is much politically astatine involvement successful this drastic reversal of the US Good Neighbour Policy, associated with Latin American diplomacy since 1933 and the presidency of Franklin D Roosevelt, than initially meets adjacent the astir discerning eye. Of course, this contented of cooperative relations was repeatedly undermined aft the Castro gyration successful Cuba and Salvador Allende’s electoral triumph successful Chile.
Most informed observers assumed that the onslaught connected Venezuela aimed astatine achieving authorities change, installing Maria Corina Machado, an ardent advocator of US intervention, longtime person of the anti-Maduro opposition, and 2025 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, whose acceptance code lavishly praised Trump arsenic the much deserving candidate. The astir unexpected improvement of the involution has been the bypassing of Machado, and the installation alternatively of Vice President Delcy Rodriguez arsenic Venezuela’s caller president. Washington claimed assurance that Rodriguez would cooperate with US interests, peculiarly successful narration to Venezuelan lipid and different resources, and reconstruct stableness connected presumption compatible with US priorities. Trump adjacent declared that had Machado declined the Nobel Prize connected the grounds that helium deserved it, she would person go Venezuela’s president.
A much plausible mentation is that Machado lacked capable home enactment to stabilise the country, whereas Rodriguez appeared consenting to accommodate US economical demands, peculiarly those relating to power implicit Venezuela’s assets wealth, portion enjoying broader fashionable support. The pre-attack “pro-democracy” communicative promoted by US authorities propaganda gained constricted credibility from this continuity of leadership, alternatively than a symbolic march into Caracas alongside Machado to preside implicit her inauguration arsenic Venezuela’s caller puppet leader. Yet aft gathering Trump connected January 9, executives of large US lipid corporations, wide assumed to beryllium the main beneficiaries of the intervention, expressed reservations astir resuming operations, citing concerns implicit instability pursuing the US takeover.
Clarifying relations betwixt planetary instrumentality and planetary security
This subject cognition successful Venezuela, unneurotic with its governmental aftermath, intelligibly violates planetary instrumentality governing the usage of force, arsenic authoritatively codified successful the UN Charter. Yet adjacent this seemingly straightforward appraisal contains ambiguity. The charter’s organization plan privileges the 5 victorious powers of the 2nd satellite war, granting them imperishable rank of the Security Council and an unrestricted veto. In effect, work for managing planetary information was deliberately entrusted to these states, which besides became the archetypal atomic weapons powers, enabling immoderate 1 of them to artifact Security Council enactment adjacent erstwhile supported by a 14–1 majority.
The Security Council is the lone governmental organ of the UN authorised to contented binding decisions, speech from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ, however, operates nether voluntary jurisdiction, arsenic states whitethorn withhold consent to what is known arsenic “compulsory jurisdiction”. As a result, the absorption of planetary information has successful signifier been near to the discretion of the Permanent Five, usually dominated by the US oregon paralysed by vetoes.
In this sense, the Venezuelan cognition should beryllium understood little arsenic signalling the illness of planetary instrumentality than arsenic an look of nihilistic geopolitical management. If so, the due remedy is not simply to fortify planetary law, but to portion geopolitical actors of their self-assigned managerial relation successful planetary security. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine successful 2022 tin beryllium viewed similarly: a geopolitical failure, shaped by irresponsible NATO provocations, culminating successful Russia’s ain provoked yet egregious breach of Article 2(4).
The Venezuelan cognition further erodes immoderate residual assurance successful the capableness of the Permanent Five, and particularly Trump’s United States, to negociate peace, information oregon genocide prevention. It truthful reinforces the request to see alternate frameworks, either by curtailing the veto oregon by shifting information governance beyond the UN to counter-hegemonic mechanisms, including BRICS, China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and emerging South–South improvement frameworks.
It indispensable nevertheless beryllium emphasised that planetary instrumentality remains indispensable and effectual successful astir areas of cross-border interaction. In domains specified arsenic diplomatic immunity, maritime and aviation safety, tourism and communications, negotiated ineligible standards are mostly respected and disputes resolved peacefully. International instrumentality functions wherever reciprocity prevails, but has ne'er constrained great-power ambition successful the domain of planetary security, wherever asymmetries of hard powerfulness dominate.
The 2025 US nationalist information strategy: Nihilistic geopolitics
To recognize Venezuela’s spot wrong Trump’s worldview, it is indispensable to analyse the National Security Strategy of the United States, released successful November 2025. Trump’s screen missive is suffused with narcissism and contempt for internationalism, including planetary law, multilateral institutions, and the UN. He proclaims: “America is beardown and respected again — and due to the fact that of that, we are making bid each implicit the world.” Such rhetoric, pathological successful immoderate mean individual, is alarming erstwhile issued by a person who controls the usage of atomic weapons. Trump concludes by promising to marque America “safer, richer, freer, greater, and much almighty than ever before”.
The NSS repeatedly invokes “pre-eminence” arsenic the cardinal nonsubjective of US overseas policy, to beryllium pursued by immoderate means necessary. The Venezuelan involution appears arsenic a sequel to US complicity successful Israel’s genocide successful Gaza, and a imaginable prelude to further projects, including power implicit Greenland and renewed subject threats against Iran. Yet the document’s superior absorption is Latin America, framed done a revival of the Monroe Doctrine, present reinforced by the explicitly named “Trump Corollary,” colloquially dubbed the “Donroe Doctrine”.
This hemispheric crook abandons the post–Cold War ambition of planetary US enactment pursued by Obama and Biden, which consumed immense resources successful failed state-building ventures successful Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan. Instead, it prioritises assets extraction, securing oil, uncommon earths and minerals with immense benefits for US corporations, portion marginalising NATO and abandoning multilateralism, underlying the caller US withdrawal from information successful 66 abstracted organization entities, including the clime alteration treaty. Venezuela, with its immense lipid reserves, strategical determination and authoritarian populist government, provided an perfect investigating crushed — and conveniently diverted attraction from Trump’s idiosyncratic entanglements with Jeffrey Epstein.
In applicable terms, the involution resembles a coup alternatively than authorities change, accompanied by an explicit request that the caller enactment instrumentality orders from Washington arsenic the terms of governmental survival. Trump and his Cuban exile caput of state, Marco Rubio, openly linked Venezuela to aboriginal regime-change efforts successful Colombia and Cuba, with Trump issuing a crude menace to Colombian President Gustavo Petro and US forces reportedly sidesplitting 32 Cuban members of Maduro’s Presidential Guard.
Implications
It remains uncertain whether Delcy Rodriguez’s authorities volition negociate an statement that preserves ceremonial sovereignty portion surrendering substantive control. Such an result would awesome an clasp of digital-age gunboat diplomacy, reversing the UN rule of Permanent Sovereignty implicit Natural Resources, and reinstating a hierarchical hemispheric order. This imaginativeness adjacent contemplates the subordination of Canadian sovereignty to Washington’s governmental and economical preferences.
International reactions to the battle connected Venezuela person been muted, reflecting fear, disorder oregon perceived futility. Meanwhile, geopolitical rivalry intensifies, peculiarly with Russia and China, raising the spectre of a caller Cold War oregon atomic conflict. The NSS makes wide that US preeminence requires excluding each extra-hemispheric powers from the region, by its repeated referencing of “our Hemisphere”.
The Venezuelan occurrence frankincense exemplifies a broader strategy: the rejection of planetary law, the marginalisation of the UN, and the unilateral assertion of US dominance successful the Western Hemisphere, on with imaginable involution astir anyplace connected the planet, but with contiguous relevance to Greenland and Iran.
The views expressed successful this nonfiction are the author’s ain and bash not needfully bespeak Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
English (US) ·