10 hours ago
3
US President Donald Trump has announced that helium volition bounds the fig of refugees entering the US to 7,500 for the fiscal twelvemonth 2026.
This is simply a grounds debased since the 1980 Refugee Act erstwhile a headdress connected refugees entering the state was acceptable astatine 50,000 per year, but could beryllium changed. That was the aforesaid twelvemonth that the US exile resettlement programme was launched. Currently, the headdress sits astatine 125,000, acceptable by erstwhile President Joe Biden.
Furthermore, the Trump medication said precedence volition beryllium fixed to achromatic South Africans.
But portion the caller headdress is simply a important driblet from the fig of refugees admitted by the US successful much caller years, the US has made usage of highly restrictive and often racist migration policies passim its history.
Who volition beryllium allowed to instrumentality refuge successful the US from 2026?
No much than 7,500 radical volition beryllium granted exile presumption and these indispensable acquisition precise pugnacious checks earlier they tin enter. Approval by the secretaries of authorities and homeland information volition beryllium required.
The White House announcement reiterated that Trump besides signed a proclamation successful June that stipulates that overseas nationals tin inactive beryllium denied introduction if allowing them into the state would harm the country’s interests.
Why is Trump prioritising achromatic South Africans?
Trump claims that White Afrikaaners are at hazard of “genocide” successful South Africa. In February this year, helium signed Executive Order 14204, titled “Addressing Egregious Actions of the Republic of South Africa”. The bid was made successful effect to South Africa’s Expropriation Act 13 of 2024, which allows for onshore to beryllium seized and redistributed.
The bid criticised South Africa for seizing onshore owned by “ethnic minority” achromatic South Africans. The US threatened to withhold assistance to South Africa if the authorities continues with this. In May, 59 achromatic South Africans arrived successful the US arsenic portion of a peculiar exile programme Trump established for them.
The aforesaid month, Trump ambushed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during a sojourn the White House, lone to beryllium ambushed by Trump with a video of radical singing “Kill the Boer” successful South Africa and allegations that a “white genocide” was taking place.
“People are fleeing South Africa for their ain safety. Their onshore is being confiscated, and successful galore cases, they’re being killed,” Trump said during the gathering with Ramaphosa successful May.
Do achromatic Afrikaaners request exile status?
Experts accidental not really.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa signed the Act to close apartheid-era wrongs. However, the instrumentality allows the authorities to prehend privately owned onshore from anyone, careless of race, for nationalist purposes with compensation, oregon successful immoderate cases, without compensation.
The Act replaces a erstwhile 1975 law, which was criticised for its deficiency of clarity astir compensation.
During apartheid, achromatic South Africans, who are chiefly Afrikaans-speaking descendants of Dutch settlers and English-speaking descendants of British colonists, held control, and often violently sidelined the Black majority.
While apartheid ended successful 1994, achromatic South Africans, who correspond astir 7 percent of the population, inactive ain much than 70 percent of the land, portion much than fractional of the Black colonisation lives successful poverty.
At his White House meeting, Ramaphosa told Trump that portion South Africa does person a occupation with convulsive crime, it was being perpetrated against each South Africans, not conscionable achromatic people.
Experts person besides dismissed Trump’s claims of a achromatic genocide.
“There is nary merit to Trump’s phantasy claims of achromatic genocide,” South African historiographer Saul Dubow, prof of Commonwealth past astatine the University of Cambridge, told Al Jazeera successful May.
“South Africa is simply a convulsive state and, successful economical terms, 1 of the astir unequal societies successful the world. The unit is transgression alternatively than political, though radical injustice inevitably forms portion of the context.”
Dubow suggested that Trump whitethorn beryllium much aggravated astir South Africa’s genocide case against Israel, filed successful the International Court of Justice (ICJ) successful December 2023 successful narration to the warfare connected Gaza.
Is this truly the strictest US headdress connected refugees ever?
This is the lowest headdress connected refugees successful caller history. As good arsenic being little than the archetypal 50,000 headdress established by the 1980 Act, it is besides little than the erstwhile ceiling of 17,400 the Act sought to replace.
Every year, the fig of refugees allowed into the US is determined by the president successful consultation with the US Congress. For the fiscal years 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, a maximum of 125,000 refugees were allowed into the US.
In 1980, the US exile resettlement programme was established to let the US to identify, admit and resettle refugees fleeing struggle oregon persecution from astir the world.
Prior to 1980, however, the United States did not admit important numbers of refugees and had a past of highly restrictive laws which barred radical from circumstantial countries from entering oregon holding citizenship.
A past of prohibitive migration argumentation successful the US
Here’s a timeline of immoderate cardinal US citizenship and migration policies which person affected radical of circumstantial ethnicities and nationalities.
1790: Naturalisation Act
The Naturalisation Act defined limits connected who could go a naturalised national of the US.
According to this act, naturalisation was constricted to escaped achromatic radical who had lived successful the US for 2 years and demonstrated bully motivation character.
It excluded Native Americans, enslaved radical and anyone who was not white.
1875: The Page Act
Signed successful March 1875 by President Ulysses S Grant, the Page Act was the archetypal US national instrumentality connected immigration.
The instrumentality targeted immigrants, particularly women from Asia. It decreed that the US authorities indispensable find that “the migration of immoderate taxable of China, Japan, oregon immoderate Oriental country, to the United States, is escaped and voluntary”.
The Act was worded arsenic if it was protecting susceptible immigrants, arsenic it prohibited bringing women into the US for forced labour oregon enactment work. Anyone recovered to person brought an migrant from an Asian state into the US without their consent could beryllium imprisoned and fined.
However, critics person pointed retired that, successful practice, the Act was racist and sexist. It came astatine a clip erstwhile poorness and famine successful China had caused galore Chinese radical to question opportunities successful the US. In particular, Chinese women migrated to the US, seeking jobs, from the 1850s.
According to an nonfiction published by the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS), San Francisco officials started making efforts to deport Chinese women of “ill fame” from the 1860s. The nonfiction added that astatine that point, “all Chinese women were astir apt stereotyped arsenic prostitutes”.
The nonfiction highlights that 1 of the enduring impacts of the Page Act was the stigmatisation of Asian women. Beyond facing radical discrimination, Asian women were fetishised and sexualised culturally.
1882: The Chinese Exclusion Act
Signed successful May 1882, the Chinese Exclusion Act barred each Chinese labourers from entering the US for 10 years.
It besides prevented Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalised citizens of the US.
The Act was extended by the Geary Act of 1892 and remained successful spot until it was repealed successful 1943.
1907: The Gentlemen’s Agreement
This was not a ceremonial instrumentality – it was, rather, an statement betwixt the US and Japan.
The agreement, negotiated by President Theodore Roosevelt, asked the Japanese authorities to restrict the migration of Japanese labourers to the US.
In speech for this, Japanese students would beryllium permitted to proceed to be integrated schools.
The statement was drawn up successful effect to nationalist choler astir the rising fig of Japanese labourers and cultivation workers who had migrated to capable the spread near by Chinese workers.
1917: Asiatic Barred Zone Act
This instrumentality created a “barred zone” from the Middle East and Southeast Asia, spanning astir Asian countries.
Nationals of these countries were restricted from entering the US.
1924: The Johnson-Reed Act
This migration enactment imposed strict limits connected the fig of radical from different countries who could migrate to the US each year.
It stipulated a “national origins” quota, which decreed that lone 2 percent of the fig of radical of immoderate nationality surviving successful the US successful 1890 could participate the state each year.
The instrumentality besides wholly barred radical from Asian countries from immigrating to the US.
2017: Trump’s ain ‘Muslim ban’
During his archetypal term, Trump enacted a travel ban dubbed the “Muslim ban”.
Under this ban, Trump signed an enforcement bid banning citizens of 7 Muslim-majority countries, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, from entering the US for 90 days.
The bid besides suspended the US exile programme for 120 days and indefinitely barred Syrian refugees.
Trump’s question prohibition went done consequent rounds of revisions. The archetypal mentation was blocked by courts for being discriminatory.
The last version, which was upheld by the Supreme Court successful 2018, affected citizens from Yemen, Syria, Iran, Libya and Somalia alongside Venezuela and North Korea.
In 2021, President Joe Biden signed an enforcement bid reversing the question ban.
2025: Trump’s question ban
While Trump did not reinstate his archetypal question prohibition during his 2nd term, helium signed a proclamation successful June this twelvemonth imposing a implicit prohibition connected nationals of 12 countries from travelling to the US. Many of them are African nations.
They see Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
Under this proclamation, citizens from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela are taxable to partial restrictions.
Citing interior authorities documents, US media has reported that Trump could significantly expand this question prohibition database to see 36 much countries, 26 of which are successful Africa. The White House has not officially announced that the question prohibition database has been expanded, however.
English (US) ·