US Supreme Court blocks order on likely racial bias in new Texas voter map

Texas redrew its voting representation arsenic portion of US President Donald Trump’s program to triumph other Republican seats successful the 2026 midterm elections.

The United States Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a little tribunal ruling that recovered the Texas 2026 legislature redistricting program apt discriminates connected the ground of race.

The bid signed connected Friday by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito volition stay successful spot astatine slightest for the adjacent fewer days portion the tribunal considers whether to let the caller map, which is favourable to Republicans, to beryllium utilized successful the US midterm elections adjacent year.

Recommended Stories

• list 1 of 4US tribunal blocks caller Texas legislature representation portion authorities officials appeal
• list 2 of 4Trump medication joins suit against California’s redistricting maps
• list 3 of 4Trump claims California predetermination was rigged. Is helium correct?
• list 4 of 4California’s Proposition 50 connected redistricting to walk successful stroke to Trump

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton hailed the ruling, which had granted an “administrative stay” and temporarily stopped the little court’s “injunction against Texas’s map”.

“Radical left-wing activists are abusing the judicial strategy to derail the Republican docket and bargain the US House for Democrats. I americium warring to halt this blatant effort to upend our governmental system,” Paxton said successful an earlier station connected societal media.

Texas redrew its legislature map successful August arsenic portion of US President Donald Trump’s efforts to sphere a slim Republican bulk successful the House of Representatives successful adjacent year’s mid-term elections, touching disconnected a nationwide redistricting conflict betwixt Republicans and Democrats.

The caller redistricting representation for Texas was engineered to springiness Republicans 5 further House seats, but a sheet of national judges successful El Paso ruled 2-1 connected Tuesday, saying that the civilian rights groups that challenged the representation connected behalf of Black and Hispanic voters were apt to triumph their case.

The redrawn representation was apt racially discriminatory successful usurpation of US law protections, the tribunal found.

Nonprofit quality outlet The Texas Tribune said the authorities is present backmost to using, temporarily, its 2025 legislature representation for voting arsenic the Supreme Court has not yet decided what representation Texas should yet use, and the “legality of the map” volition play retired successful tribunal implicit the coming weeks and months.

Texas was the archetypal authorities to conscionable Trump’s demands connected redistricting. Missouri and North Carolina followed Texas with caller redistricting maps that would adhd an further Republican spot each.

To antagonistic those moves, California voters approved a ballot inaugural to springiness Democrats an further 5 seats there.

Redrawn elector maps are present facing tribunal challenges successful California, Missouri and North Carolina.

Republicans presently clasp slim majorities successful some chambers of Congress, and ceding power of either the House oregon Senate to the Democrats successful the November 2026 midterm elections would imperil Trump’s legislative docket successful the 2nd fractional of his latest word successful office.

There person been ineligible fights astatine the Supreme Court for decades implicit the signifier known arsenic gerrymandering – the redrawing of electoral territory boundaries to marginalise a definite acceptable of voters and summation the power of others.

The tribunal issued its astir important ruling to day connected the substance successful 2019, declaring that gerrymandering for partisan reasons – to boost the electoral chances of one’s ain enactment and weaken one’s governmental hostile – could not beryllium challenged successful national courts.

But gerrymandering driven chiefly by contention remains unlawful nether the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment warrant of adjacent extortion nether the instrumentality and 15th Amendment prohibition connected radical favoritism successful voting.