Islamabad, Pakistan – Pakistan’s Senate connected Monday approved a law amendment that aims to bring sweeping changes to the country’s judicial strategy and to the military’s bid operation amid disapproval that it seeks to weaken oversight implicit the authorities and leaders of the nation’s almighty army.
The projected 27th Amendment yet sailed done the Senate successful a raucous evening sitting aft the absorption boycotted the session.
Like successful the Senate, the amendment present needs to unafraid a two-thirds bulk successful the National Assembly, the little location of parliament, which is expected to ballot connected the draught connected Tuesday afternoon. If it gets those votes, the amendment would request President Asif Ali Zardari’s signature to go law.
But some the contents of the projected amendment and the mode successful which the Pakistani authorities has sought to propulsion it done person sparked criticism, including from elder sitting judges, adjacent arsenic different experts said the changes are justified.
The 27th Amendment of the constitution, if it becomes law, would successful effect assistance immunity from transgression prosecution to the top-most subject leaders portion besides reshaping the military’s bid structure. These would beryllium done changes to Article 243 of Pakistan’s Constitution.
Separate provisions successful the amendment purpose to acceptable up a Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), among different ineligible reforms.
But portion galore law amendments are controversial, critics person questioned the unreserved with which the existent amendment has been moved. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar presented it successful the Senate connected Saturday, the aforesaid time that the furniture approved it.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif – who was successful Baku, Azerbaijan, connected a authorities sojourn on with service main Field Marshal Asim Munir – attended the furniture gathering virtually earlier his instrumentality to Islamabad connected Sunday.
After consultations wrong the authorities and with its allies, a revised draught was circulated successful the Senate connected Monday and passed the aforesaid evening. By contrast, the 26th Amendment, portion besides criticised by the opposition, followed months of nationalist debate.
So what is the 27th Amendment each about? What makes it truthful controversial? And however are its defenders justifying it?
President Asif Ali Zardari, centre, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, right, jointly confer the baton of tract marshal upon Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir successful Islamabad successful May this twelvemonth [Handout/Government of Pakistan]How volition it alteration Article 243 of the constitution?
Article 243 defines the narration betwixt Pakistan’s civilian authorities and the military.
The revision amends Article 243 to make a caller station of main of defence forces (CDF), to beryllium held by the service chief. This fundamentally gives the service main authorization besides implicit the aerial unit and the navy. If the amendment is passed, the station of president of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC) would beryllium abolished aboriginal this month.
The CJCSC is presently held by four-star General Sahir Shamshad, who is owed to discontinue connected November 27.
Since independency successful 1947, Pakistan’s military, particularly the army, has been the most almighty institution successful nationalist life. Four coups and decades of nonstop and indirect subject regularisation person entrenched that influence, and the service main has agelong been the country’s astir almighty figure.
Its existent holder, Munir, became service main successful November 2022 and was promoted to five-star rank connected May 20, conscionable 10 days aft the state ended its four-day conflict with India.
The 27th Amendment would besides assistance five-star officers beingness immunity portion allowing them to “retain rank, privileges and stay successful azygous for life”.
Munir is lone the 2nd Pakistani subject officer, aft Field Marshal Ayub Khan successful the 1960s, to person received the five-star designation. None of the different subject branches, specified arsenic the aerial unit oregon navy, has had a five-star official.
The projected amendment besides creates the station of commandant of the National Strategic Command (NSC), responsible, among different things, for the country’s atomic command. The caput of the NSC would beryllium appointed lone from the service successful consultation with the service chief/CDF.
According to the Pakistani Constitution astatine present, Article 248 stipulates that “no transgression proceedings whatsoever shall beryllium instituted oregon continued against the president oregon a politician successful immoderate tribunal during his word of office.” But erstwhile retired of office, they bask nary specified privileges.
Military generals presently person nary specified immunity. Before the 27th Amendment, the rubric of tract marshal was considered purely honorific with nary further powers oregon privileges. However, the projected changes would fundamentally codify the ranking arsenic a recognised law position.
If the amendment passes, it would instrumentality a two-thirds bulk successful parliament to region a five-star-ranked authoritative – adjacent though an elected government, by contrast, loses powerfulness erstwhile a elemental bulk successful parliament votes against it. And a five-star serviceman would bask immunity from transgression prosecution for life.
“Democracy does not past wherever impunity is made a law right,” Rida Hosain, a Lahore-based law lawyer, told Al Jazeera. “It grants a nonelected service serviceman protections and powers that nary democratically elected person successful the state has.”
Pakistan’s projected law amendment would make a Federal Constitutional Court and render the Supreme Court lone an “appellate court”, according to experts [Anjum Naveed/AP Photo]What are the judicial changes?
The draught amendment seeks to make a imperishable Federal Constitutional Court.
The FCC would beryllium headed by its ain main justness and staffed by an adjacent fig of judges from each of Pakistan’s 4 provinces arsenic good arsenic from Islamabad. It would adjudicate successful disputes betwixt governments, either the national authorities and a authorities authorities oregon erstwhile antithetic authorities governments clash.
Judges of the FCC would discontinue astatine 68, dissimilar Supreme Court judges, who discontinue astatine 65. The FCC main justice’s tenure would beryllium capped astatine 3 years.
The draught besides gives the president powerfulness to transportation a justice from 1 precocious tribunal to different connected the connection of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), the assemblage liable for recommending appointments to Pakistan’s superior judiciary.
After the 26th Amendment was passed past year, the transportation of judges was to hap from 1 precocious tribunal to different precocious tribunal lone done a statesmanlike order.
However, the judge’s consent was indispensable for a transportation arsenic were consultation with the main justness of Pakistan and the 2 main justices of respective precocious courts.
That would alteration nether the caller revision: The president would beryllium capable to transportation a justice connected the proposal of the JCP without the consent of the acrophobic judge.
Additionally, if a justice refuses his transfer, helium would beryllium fixed an accidental to contiguous his reasons earlier the JCP, and if the assemblage finds the reasons invalid, the justice would person to retire.
Hosain said the amendment would mean judges tin beryllium transferred to different jurisdictions without their consent portion refusal could pb to proceedings earlier the Supreme Judicial Council, the assemblage which holds judges accountable.
“The information that refusal leads to accountability proceedings being initiated is simply a veiled menace that weaponises administrative powerfulness to enforce compliance. It transforms an autarkic judicial bureau into 1 overshadowed by the changeless fearfulness of punitive oregon retaliatory transfer,” she added.
Reema Omer, ineligible advisor for the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), a Geneva-based nongovernmental organisation of judges and lawyers, said the caller amendment has concerning implications, peculiarly successful the abbreviated and mean term.
“The enforcement volition name the judges who volition person the sole jurisdiction to clasp the enforcement accountable,” she told Al Jazeera.
“It appears this is being done to shield the existing set-up from judicial scrutiny and accountability. Also, if and erstwhile required, the FCC tin beryllium utilized to springiness law screen and legitimacy to these decisions of this set-up,” Omer added.
Senior sitting judges person criticised the amendment too.
Mansoor Ali Shah, the 2nd astir elder justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP), wrote successful an unfastened missive to Chief Justice Yahya Afridi connected Monday stating that the FCC does not correspond a “genuine betterment agenda” but is alternatively a “political instrumentality to weaken and power the judiciary”.
Calling it a “manipulation of [the] judicial process”, Shah said specified a tribunal cannot beryllium independent.
“History does not easy forgive specified abdications of duty; it records them arsenic law failures of enactment and moments erstwhile soundlessness wrong institutions weakened the precise edifice they were meant to guard,” helium wrote.
What bash defenders of the amendment say?
The government’s rationale for bringing the changes to the constitution was presented successful the draught of the amendment, successful which it said the connection stems from the expanding fig of law petitions being filed earlier the Supreme Court, which has “significantly impacted the timely disposal of regular civilian and transgression cases”.
Changes to Article 243, the authorities has said, were projected to amended the “procedural clarity and administrative operation relating to the equipped forces”.
Some experts agreed.
Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmad Khokhar, an advocator of the Supreme Court, said a imperishable FCC would supply “focused expertise and timely adjudication”.
“It is empowered to construe the constitution, resoluteness federal-provincial disputes, find the validity of laws and render advisory opinions. This ensures focused expertise and timely adjudication,” the Islamabad-based lawyer told Al Jazeera.
While the instauration of the FCC volition bring coherence, velocity and subject to law adjudication, the instauration of the CDF bureau would unify strategical bid and heighten coordination without disturbing the existing services’ autonomy, Khokhar argued.
“Both reforms are grounded successful the realities of Pakistan’s governance challenges and expanding complexity of authorities functions. These measures volition assistance Pakistan germinate into a mature, rule-based ideology wherever judicial, civilian and defence institutions execute their specialised roles successful harmony,” helium said.
What are immoderate of the deeper criticisms of the amendment?
But these explanations person truthful acold failed to fulfill sceptics.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) questioned the urgency with which the amendment was tabled.
“The government’s haste, including the lack of immoderate meaningful consultation with the governmental opposition, the wider ineligible fraternity and civilian society, calls into question the precise volition down moving this amendment bill,” the HRCP said.
HRCP deplores the mode successful which the 27th Amendment to the Constitution is being tabled successful Parliament. The government’s haste—including the lack of immoderate meaningful consultation with the governmental opposition, the wider ineligible fraternity and civilian society—calls into question the…
— Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (@HRCP87) November 9, 2025
Omer of the ICJ warned the amendment marked a “fundamental change” for the judiciary.
“The 27th Amendment reduces the Supreme Court of Pakistan to lone an appellate court. It is besides nary longer the ‘Supreme Court of Pakistan’ but lone the ‘Supreme Court’ and its main justness volition beryllium the CJ of the SC, not the CJ of Pakistan,” she said.
The judiciary, astatine slightest successful the abbreviated and mean term, volition beryllium mostly beholden to the executive, according to Omer.
“Any existent accountability oregon reappraisal of the enforcement and parliament appears unlikely. And immoderate alleviation to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf against the wishes of the strategy besides seems unlikely,” she added, referring to the largest absorption party, the PTI.
The PTI, led by erstwhile Prime Minister Imran Khan, who has been successful jailhouse for the past 2 years, governed from 2018 to 2022.
It was removed by a parliamentary ballot of nary assurance successful April 2022. The enactment was disqualified from participating successful past year’s elections, but autarkic candidates from the PTI nevertheless won the azygous largest stock of seats (93) amid allegations of manipulation successful the ballot count, charges that the authorities rejected.
No enactment secured a majority, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) formed the authorities successful conjugation with the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP).
Meanwhile, Hosain besides cautioned that nether the amendment, portion the premier curate would proceed to beryllium exposed to governmental scrutiny and the volition of elected representatives, immunity has been granted to the apical generals.
“It institutionalises the supremacy of the azygous implicit the ballot,” she said.
Omer pointed retired that Pakistani governmental parties, including the PPP, present an confederation spouse of the ruling PML-N, had successful the past resisted law protections to the military. That, she said, had present changed.
“The 27th Amendment is law surrender,” she said.

1 month ago
13









English (US) ·